Yes. The more interesting question is why the answer surprises people.
In Christian theology Satan is usually the adversary, so “Satanic” easily becomes shorthand for cruel, corrupt, or malicious. A theistic Satanist begins from a different religious premise. That difference in theology does not remove the ordinary moral problem every person still faces: what do you do with other people's freedom, safety, trust, and vulnerability?
We do not define goodness as obedience
The Church puts a great deal of weight on personal responsibility. That means a person cannot excuse conduct simply by saying a leader ordered it, a text seemed to permit it, or a spiritual experience felt important.
Autonomy without responsibility is just permission-seeking in another form. If you choose, you also own the consequences of the choice.
Consent is a boundary, not an inconvenience
Religious intensity does not create a right to pressure another person. Worship, ritual, relationships, disclosure of private information, and participation in community life all require meaningful choice.
That is why the Church's public rules reject coercion, harassment, abuse, threats, and illegal activity. A spiritual vocabulary does not turn those things into virtues.
Honour is mostly unglamorous
In practice, moral character is often visible in small acts: keeping a confidence, admitting when you were wrong, not humiliating someone for changing their mind, paying what you owe, respecting a boundary, correcting a false claim you repeated, or leaving a person alone when they have asked to be left alone.
None of that is uniquely Satanic. It is simply what responsibility looks like when it leaves the page.
What about “good” and “evil”?
Different religions load those words with different theological meanings. We are not required to accept a Christian account of cosmic good and evil in order to recognize suffering, exploitation, dishonesty, courage, loyalty, or care.
We also do not claim that every Satanist shares one ethical system. The wider Satanist field is decentralized. This article describes the Church's expectations, not a universal moral code for everyone using the word Satanist.
The standard is conduct
If someone wants to know whether a Satanist is a good person, the fairest answer is the same one we would use for anyone else: watch what they do when they have power, when there is no audience, when they are angry, and when respecting another person's freedom costs them something.
A religious title cannot settle that question in advance.